Interstate Income Act of 1959
| Taxation in the United States |
|---|
 This article is part of a series on |
| Federal taxation |
| Authority · History Internal Revenue Service Court • Forms • Code • Revenue Taxpayer standing |
| Income tax · Payroll tax Alternative Minimum Tax Estate tax · Excise tax · Gift tax Corporate tax · Capital gains tax |
| State & local taxation |
| State income tax · State tax levels Sales tax · Use tax · Property tax |
|
Federal tax reform
|
| Tax protester arguments: Constitutional · 16th Amendment Statutory · Conspiracy |
The Interstate Income Act of 1959, also known as Public Law 86-272,[1] is a United States statute that allows a business to go, or send representatives, into a state to solicit orders for goods without being subject to a net income tax.[2] It is currently codified at .
|
|
Public Law 86-272 was enacted in response to outcries from business over the decision held in Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota, .[3] In Northwestern States, the Supreme Court upheld the imposition of a Minnesota tax on an Iowa corporation that solicited orders and maintained a leased office in Minnesota.[4] However, the Court did not make clear whether the maintenance of employees in the state (who solicited orders that were delivered and accepted outside the state) would have been enough to give rise to the state’s power to impose its tax.
Public Law 86-272 addressed that circumstance by acting as a 'stopgap'[5] by restricting a state from collecting income tax on solicited sales within its borders, as long as the orders are filled or shipped outside of the state.[2]
Public Law 86-272 protects only solicitation of orders for tangible personal property.[5]
Protection applies to activities that are limited to:
- Solicitation by employees of orders that are approved outside the state and shipped from outside the state.[2]
- Solicitation by independent contractors if the sales are shipped from outside the state.[6]
Public Law 86-272 does not protect a corporation in the state where it is incorporated.[7] Likewise, it does not protect sellers of services or intangibles. In addition, it provides protection only from taxes measured by income. Taxes measured by net worth or gross receipts, or sales and use taxes, are not covered.[8]
- ^ Mudford, Scott. "A case for updating P.L. 86-272.(Interstate Income Tax Act of 1959)". The Tax Adviser.
- ^ a b c Garrett, Jr., Joe; Roshto,Ladonna; Vandevender,Christy. "810-27-1-4-.19 Public Law 86-272 Exemption from Income Tax". Retrieved on 2008-11-14.
- ^ "Linear Films, Inc. v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Tax Com'n". Oklahoma Tax Commission. Retrieved on 2008-11-14.
- ^ "NORTHWESTERN CEMENT CO. v. MINN., 358 U.S. 450 (1959)". FindLaw. Retrieved on 2008-11-15.
- ^ a b Nellen, Annette. "The 50th Anniversary of Public Law 86-272". AICPA. Retrieved on 2008-11-14.
- ^ "RULE §3.554". Texas Administrative Code. Retrieved on 2008-11-15.
- ^ "Application and Interpretation of Public Law 86-272". State of California – Franchise Tax Board. Retrieved on 2008-11-15.
- ^ "Letter Ruling 86-10: Nexus and Public Law 86-272: Solicitation of Sales Non-Resident Salesperson; Automobile Leased by Corporation". Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Retrieved on 2008-11-15.
- Title 15, Chapter 10B, Subchapter I--current text of the Act from the Legal Information Institute
